Women's Overview

The 74th annual Red Mass was celebrated at the Cathedral of St. Matthew the Apostle this week, marking the Supreme Court’s new term.

There’s a mass held every fall that most people never hear about, tucked into the same week the Supreme Court goes back to work. It’s not about politics, and it’s not about any one case. It’s older than almost every tradition still standing in American public life, and it’s aimed at something simple: asking for wisdom before nine people start deciding things that will shape the next year of this country.

You don’t have to follow the Court closely to feel the weight of what it does. Every one of us lives downstream of decisions made by people we’ll never meet, in a building we’ll never enter, about questions we didn’t get a vote on. The Red Mass exists because, for 74 years running, a room full of people who do have a vote — judges, lawyers, law students — have shown up and asked for help getting it right.

What actually happened this week

On October 4, the 74th annual Red Mass was celebrated at the Cathedral of St. Matthew the Apostle in Washington, D.C. — the same church, the same tradition, that’s marked the opening of the Supreme Court’s term since before most of us were born. Cardinal Robert McElroy, Archbishop of Washington, served as principal celebrant. Archbishop Timothy Broglio, who leads the Archdiocese for the Military Services, gave the homily.

More than a thousand people filled the cathedral, according to EWTN News’s reporting on the event. Supreme Court justices were there. So were law students and faculty from Georgetown and Catholic University. Vice President JD Vance attended with his family — a detail that made headlines on its own, but one that’s really just this year’s version of something that happens every single year, regardless of who holds which office.

Where the tradition actually comes from

The name sounds dramatic. It isn’t about anything violent — it’s named for the red vestments traditionally worn at the mass, a color the Church uses for occasions tied to the Holy Spirit. The idea is old: before a legal term begins, the people responsible for interpreting and applying the law gather to ask for guidance bigger than their own judgment.

Seventy-four years is a long time for any tradition to survive in American public life, let alone one that sits this close to a branch of government most people assume keeps church and state at arm’s length. It has survived because it was never actually about one administration, one Court, or one set of justices. It’s older than any of them, and it will outlast whoever is sitting on the bench this year too.

What Archbishop Broglio actually said

A homily at an event like this could easily turn into something abstract — big words about justice in general, nothing you could actually hold onto. Broglio’s didn’t. He spoke directly to what it means to do demanding, high-stakes work well, framing it as something bigger than a job description.

He talked about being “architects of hope” — language aimed squarely at the lawyers and judges in the room, but one that lands just as easily on anyone doing work that affects people who are depending on them to get it right. He also raised the treatment of migrants and refugees directly, a reminder that asking for wisdom isn’t the same as asking for comfort. Sometimes wisdom points straight at the hardest question in the room.

Why this isn’t a story about taking sides

It’s easy to hear “Supreme Court” and “religious service” in the same sentence and brace for an argument. This isn’t that. The Red Mass isn’t a lobbying event, and it isn’t aimed at any pending case or any particular outcome. It’s a request for wisdom, offered to everyone in the room regardless of how any of them eventually rules on anything.

That distinction matters, because the alternative reading — that this is somehow a religious thumb on the scale of the law — misses what’s actually been happening here for 74 years running. Justices across very different ideological lines have attended over the decades. The request being made is the same one you’d make for anyone doing work you’re depending on them to do well: not “agree with me,” but “please be careful, and please be wise.”

What it’s actually like to ask for help before hard work

Most of us don’t get a cathedral full of a thousand people and a cardinal’s blessing before our hardest weeks at work. But the instinct behind it — pausing before something difficult begins, and admitting you want help doing it well — is one you’ve probably felt even if you’ve never named it.

Maybe it’s the quiet minute before a hard conversation with your kid. Maybe it’s asking a friend to just sit with you before a doctor’s appointment you’re dreading. The scale is different, but the move is the same: naming that something matters enough to ask for help with it, instead of pretending you’ll just muscle through on your own.

What this says about how institutions actually hold up

A tradition surviving 74 years says something about how institutions actually stay standing — not through grand reinvention every cycle, but through small, repeated acts that nobody outside the room notices most years. Nobody was covering the Red Mass in year 12, or year 40. It just kept happening, quietly, every October, while the country argued about everything else.

That’s worth sitting with if you’ve ever felt like the things holding your own life together — a weekly call with your mother, a standing coffee with the same friend for a decade — don’t look impressive from the outside. They don’t have to look impressive. They just have to keep happening.

What this means heading into the Court’s new term

The justices who sat in that cathedral on October 4 are about to spend a year deciding cases that will reach into real households — custody disputes, workplace rules, questions about who owes what to whom. None of that changes because of one mass. But the instinct behind the mass — that this work deserves more than confidence, it deserves humility — is one worth hoping actually travels with them into the building.

You can’t control how any justice approaches their work this term. What you can control is whether you bring that same instinct into your own hardest decisions this fall — the ones at your kitchen table, not the ones in a courtroom, but no less in need of being approached carefully.

Carrying this into your own week

1) Notice what you’re about to do without pausing for it. Most of us walk into hard conversations, hard decisions, and hard weeks without ever naming that they’re hard. Naming it first is half the preparation.

2) Ask for help the way the room full of justices did — out loud, specifically, before you need it. Not a vague hope that things work out, but an actual request: for wisdom, for patience, for the right words when you sit down to say the hard thing.

3) Let a quiet tradition be enough, even if nobody’s watching it. The Red Mass ran for decades before anyone outside Washington paid attention to it. Whatever steadies you — a prayer, a walk, a call to the one friend who always answers — doesn’t need an audience to be doing real work.

This article was produced with the assistance of AI and reviewed by Womens Overview editors prior to publication.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top